Logos Bible Software Wiki > Resource Review >

Resource: TWOT (Theological Wordbook of the Old Testament)

Key Features

Emphasis on theological words, combined with a less technical presentation
Separates into derivatives, noting if there’s a demonstrable relationship
Arranged by TWOT number; can get confused with Strongs numbers. An index at the back correlates Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible with the numbers of the roots and derivatives as given in the wordbook.

About page from Logos4 for this book

Sample page from this book

Logos Resource Page

http://www.logos.com/product/1102/theological-wordbook-of-the-old-testament

Forum Threads That Include Significant Discussion on this Resource

http://community.logos.com/forums/p/5606/43522.aspx (managing click-thru on TWOT#s)
http://community.logos.com/forums/p/6022/46536.aspx (more click-thru issues)

Wiki & Key Forum Comments

Francis (forum)

http://community.logos.com/forums/p/13331/124618.aspx
In OT studies, it’s a different ball game because there is comparatively significantly fewer quality lexical resources available. For instance, there is no real equivalent to Louw-Nida’s semantic domains (however NIDOTTE does have a semantic index that cross references to its lexical entries). For the OT then, I have found TWOT isolated in providing a strong theological and context sensitive analysis of usage. I do regard NIDOTTE as an essential complement to TWOT. If I had to choose between the two, I would go NIDOTTE for more meat. Someone who wants shorter articles might prefer the TWOT.

Enter next name followed by a comments-line above here

Thanks!

Up To Resource Review

Welcome, Guest! (sign in)